Precision Comparison Between ASTM Test Methods D7039, D2622, and D5453
Jun 24 2019 Read 114 Times
Free to read
Articles are free to download. Please login to read this article or create an account.
As regulations for sulfur maximums in the petroleum industry continue to drop, challenges surrounding compliance and product quality have increased. This has driven refineries to search for more precise sulfur analysis methods. Desulfurization expenses, which are costly, can be reduced by using one of several highly precise measurement techniques; but ensuring low variability in measurements done using these techniques is critical. These methods include D7039, D2622, and D5453, which use Monochromatic Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (MWDXRF), Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (WDXRF), and Ultraviolet Fluorescence (UVF), respectively. ASTM PTP study findings for the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) studies for these methods demonstrated that D7039 had the best reproducibility. Notably, however, a D2622 instrument such as XOS’ Sindie 2622 MWDXRF analyser can be used to meet the D2622 methodology with the precision of D7039. Download our whitepaper to learn more.
Do you like or dislike what you have read? Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. To leave comments please complete the form below. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours. Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content. Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.
In This Edition Fuel For Thought - Analytik Jena Science Award honours outstanding scientific articles - New VGO fuel and gas oil testing inspection in Louisiana - Industrial Scientific app...
View all digital editions
Sep 23 2019 Ancona, Italy
Sep 23 2019 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sep 24 2019 Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sep 24 2019 Amstserday, Netherlands
Sep 24 2019 New Delhi, India