Analytical Instrumentation

Precision Comparison Between ASTM Test Methods D7039, D2622, and D5453

Jun 24 2019

Author: X Ray Optical Systems (XOS) on behalf of XOS

Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.

Download

As regulations for sulfur maximums in the petroleum industry continue to drop, challenges surrounding compliance and product quality have increased. This has driven refineries to search for more precise sulfur analysis methods. Desulfurization expenses, which are costly, can be reduced by using one of several highly precise measurement techniques; but ensuring low variability in measurements done using these techniques is critical. These methods include D7039, D2622, and D5453, which use Monochromatic Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (MWDXRF), Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (WDXRF), and Ultraviolet Fluorescence (UVF), respectively. ASTM PTP study findings for the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) studies for these methods demonstrated that D7039 had the best reproducibility. Notably, however, a D2622 instrument such as XOS’ Sindie 2622 MWDXRF analyser can be used to meet the D2622 methodology with the precision of D7039. Download our whitepaper to learn more.


Digital Edition

PIN 25.4 Aug/Sept

September 2024

Analytical Instrumentation - Novel and Rapid LSC method for the analysis of biogenic carbon in fuels Measurement and Testing - Matrix evaluation on the Xplorer-V with Vectra autosampler accordi...

View all digital editions

Events

Africa Oil Week

Oct 07 2024 Cape Town, South Africa

13th St Petersburg International Gas Forum

Oct 08 2024 St. Petersburg, Russia

Enlit Asia 2024

Oct 08 2024 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Ros Gas Expo

Oct 08 2024 St. Petersburg, Russia

Conferenza GNL

Oct 09 2024 Bologna, Italy

View all events