Precision Comparison Between ASTM Test Methods D7039, D2622, and D5453

Analytical instrumentation

Precision Comparison Between ASTM Test Methods D7039, D2622, and D5453

24 Jun, 2019

Published over 7 years ago. See the latest and most current information on Analytical instrumentation.

Download

As regulations for sulfur maximums in the petroleum industry continue to drop, challenges surrounding compliance and product quality have increased. This has driven refineries to search for more precise sulfur analysis methods. Desulfurization expenses, which are costly, can be reduced by using one of several highly precise measurement techniques; but ensuring low variability in measurements done using these techniques is critical. These methods include D7039, D2622, and D5453, which use Monochromatic Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (MWDXRF), Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (WDXRF), and Ultraviolet Fluorescence (UVF), respectively. ASTM PTP study findings for the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) studies for these methods demonstrated that D7039 had the best reproducibility. Notably, however, a D2622 instrument such as XOS’ Sindie 2622 MWDXRF analyser can be used to meet the D2622 methodology with the precision of D7039. Download our whitepaper to learn more.

Latest White Papers

PIN 27.3 June/July 2026

Explore our Digital Edition

Discover the latest news and research

Digital edition

Explore Our Other Sites

Labmate Online
Wiley expands GC–MS spectral library to more than 1.2 million mass spectra
Explore more Arrow
Envirotech Online
Water testing labs keep bacterial basics on the curriculum as PFAS dominates budgets
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Leading UK biogas operator places first orders for new FlowSep technology
Explore more Arrow
Chromatography Today
UHPLC–MS/MS methodology detects multiple algal toxins in fish plasma
Explore more Arrow