What's Going on with Georgia's Oil Pipelines?
Apr 12 2017 Comments 0
In the wake of a new bill threatening to rewrite the rules for petroleum pipeline construction, the state Senate has Georgia well and truly on its mind. After controversy forced a temporary freeze on Senate Bill 191 last year, lawmakers are now trying to reach a compromise over the state’s petroleum pipelines.
Sponsored by state senators, the bill would set new limits on the use of eminent domain by pipeline companies. Essentially, companies would no longer be allowed to use land unless acquiring a ‘Certificate of Need’ from the Georgia Environmental Finance Authority. Plus, a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Division. Even companies not planning to use eminent domain would still need to source a permit from state environmental officials, which could take up to 180 days. This would transform the state’s existing Pipeline Act, which has been in place since 1995.
Power to the people
The movement has been largely fuelled by local residents, who voiced their concerns to a joint legislative commission. Unsurprisingly, public safety and private property rights were top priorities.
“We heard about egregious use of eminent domain” comments Frank Ginn, R- Danielsville, Senate Natural Resources and the Environment Committee Chairman. He was part of the commission, and helped shepherd the bill through the chamber. He maintains that under the new bill, the state of Georgia will be able to prevent abuse, without deterring energy giants.
Criticism from oil giants, and eco advocates
Of course, passing new bills isn’t straightforward. The proposal has received tough criticism from Georgia’s major pipeline operators, including Kinder Morgan, Colonial Pipeline and Colonial Oil. All are lobbying for a shorter review period, citing 120 days as a reasonable timeline.
Environmental advocates have also slammed lawmakers for dropping an important provision which bans the construction of new pipelines within 50 miles of coastal saltwater marshes. They also maintain that eminent domain decisions should be made by elected officials, as opposed to private agencies.
“We are certainly glad to see the petroleum pipeline bill moving forward at last, but the provision that the decision of whether or not the power of eminent domain is used for these pipelines needs to be in the hands of an elected, not an appointed, official,” explains Neill Herring, a lobbyist for the Sierra Club. “A judge of the Superior Court where the condemnation is proposed,” he adds, “is a much better official to make that very important decision.”
As well as legislative and environmental concerns, oil producers face a constant string of scientific challenges. ‘Making Elemental Analysis of Petrochemicals as Easy as 1-2-3’ spotlights the latest turnkey solutions being used to quantitatively measure elements, and drastically reduce analysis and calibration costs.
Do you like or dislike what you have read? Why not post a comment to tell others / the manufacturer and our Editor what you think. To leave comments please complete the form below. Providing the content is approved, your comment will be on screen in less than 24 hours. Leaving comments on product information and articles can assist with future editorial and article content. Post questions, thoughts or simply whether you like the content.
In This Edition Fuel for Thought Dates Announced for Methane Emissions Conference Production of Natural Gas Solutions at Russian Plant Expands Analytical Instrumentation ASTM...
View all digital editions
May 30 2017 Nuremberg, Germany
May 31 2017 Munich, Germany
May 31 2017 Bordeaux, France
May 31 2017 Baku, Azerbaijan
Jun 02 2017 Seattle, WA, USA